Exec Assistants Editorial Standards
1. Introduction:
Exec Assistants is dedicated to maintaining the highest editorial and ethical standards in delivering online content related to marketing services.
2. Principles:
2.1 Accuracy:
Content will be accurate, balanced, and transparent, judged against the best available scientific evidence. Opinions will be clearly indicated.
2.2 Accountability:
Exec Assistants is accountable to its audiences, is open to admitting mistakes, and values user feedback. Editorial processes are transparent.
2.3 Serving the Public:
Audience interests come first. Professional bodies, charities, and interest groups will be consulted, but client interests remain paramount.
2.4 Taste and Decency:
All content is suitable for a general audience and devoid of reasonably deemed offensive material.
2.5 Impartiality and Diversity of Opinion:
Content is objective, impartial, and reflects all significant strands of opinion when no scientific consensus exists.
2.6 Privacy:
Strict privacy controls are maintained. Personal information won’t be disclosed without explicit consent except for legal reasons or in the public interest.
2.7 Funding:
Exec Assistants funds its online communications, is registered in Wyoming, United States, doesn’t carry advertising, and doesn’t accept corporate sponsorship.
3. Standards:
A dedicated team of editors ensures accuracy, balance, and transparency. No favored treatment is given to partner organizations, and staff must disclose any conflicts of interest.
4. Staff Training:
All editorial staff receive training to uphold editorial standards.
5. Editorial Process:
5.1 Phase 1: Research:
Evidence-based knowledge is derived from direct experiences, peer-reviewed research, and consultations with industry experts and affected individuals.
5.2 Phase 2: Production:
Content is edited for accuracy, balance, accessibility, and tone and then reviewed by the website Editor for factual errors, style adherence, and overall presentation.
5.3 Phase 3: Policy Sign-off:
Policies are approved by the Chief Executive Officer before publication.
5.4 Phase 4: Review of Content:
Systematic content reviews are conducted annually, with user and stakeholder comments considered on an ongoing basis.
6. Appeals Procedure:
In the event of unresolved complaints, the Chief Executive Officer handles the matter.